Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Session I - Challenging Theories of Justice: The Capability Approaches of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum



Thank you everybody who registered for the course On Justice: Sen and NussbaumPlease note that we begin our first session on 3 January 2012 (Tuesday) at 2:30 pmWe will be meeting at the Library, Department of Philosophy, Arts Faculty Building, University of Delhi.

The lecture, followed by discussion — a two hours programme — will be based on the first chapter of Amartya Sen's Inequality Reexamined, titled 'Equality of What?'. The speaker, Professor Jay Drydyk will presume a prior reading on the part of all the participants.

Questions to be addressed in the lecture

1.  What was the context of debate in which Sen wrote this piece?
2.  What are his arguments for the claim that every significant theory of justice must answer the ‘equality of what’ question? (Please consider this while reading Sen’s chapter.)
3.  What is the significance of these arguments, in the wider context of debate?

Questions for the discussion period

1.  Questions about the lecture.
2.  Concerning Sen’s first, historical argument that every significant theory of social arrangements calls for equality of something: are there further counter-examples? From Indian traditions?
3.  Concerning Sen’s second, theoretical argument, from impartiality or equal consideration:
(a) Is it just a Western idea that equal consideration matters?
(b) Is it just a modern idea that equal consideration matters?
(c) Does justice sometimes require that one is not impartial, but partial, for example towards one’s own family? Towards one’s own country?
(d) Is there also a question, ‘Equal consideration of what?’ For instance, libertarians would call for equal consideration of everyone’s liberty, utilitarians would call for equal consideration of everyone’s happiness, and so on. Would that undermine Sen’s argument?
4.  Other questions arising from the reading or from the discussion.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

On Justice: Sen & Nussbaum

Course Duration: 3 January - 21 February, 2012: A series of six weekly lectures (on Tuesdays)
ByJay Drydyk, Professor, Department of Philosophy, Carleton University, Ottawa

Challenging Theories of Justice: The Capability Approaches of Amartya Sen and Martha NussbaumThis series of lectures/discussions focuses on challenges posed to prevailing liberal theories of justice (especially that of John Rawls) by the capability approach as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. The first three sessions will be devoted to the capability concepts that Sen introduced to provide an alternative ‘informational base’ for social choice and deliberation, followed by his arguments that social contract theories are neither necessary nor sufficient nor even very useful for achieving greater justice in the world. Then attention shifts to Martha Nussbaum’s arguments that social contract approaches are typically unable to account for injustices to disabled persons, to global injustice, or to injustices towards non-humans - the three ‘frontiers of justice’. Readings and discussion questions will be proposed for each session.

Reading List
1. Sen, 'Equality of What?' [chapter 1] of Inequality Reexamined, 1992.
2. Sen, 'Capability and Well-being' [chapter 2] of The Quality of Life, [eds] Sen and Nussbaum, 1993.
3. Sen, 'Introduction', The Idea of Justice, 2009.
4. Nussbaum, 'Social Contracts and Three Unsolved Problems of Justice', [chapter 1] of Frontiers of Justice, 2006, pp. 9-35.
5. Nussbaum, 'Social Contracts and Three Unsolved Problems of Justice', [chapter 1] of Frontiers of Justice, 2006, pp. 35-69.
6. Nussbaum, 'Social Contracts and Three Unsolved Problems of Justice', [chapter 1] of Frontiers of Justice, 2006, pp. 69-95.

To register for this course please email silikamohapatra@gmail.com


There are no registration or course charges. At the end of the course, you will receive a certificate of participation.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Reading Group: 5 December 2011


Abide with me;
Fast falls the eventide

Given that this Tuesday is an official holiday, we meet tomorrow, i.e. Monday, to read Chapter 7: God and the World, the last remaining chapter of the text.

Date: 5 December 2011 (Monday)
Time: 2:30 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Reading Group: 29 November 2011


A detailed discussion of Descartes, Locke, and Hume may make plain how deeply the philosophy of organism is founded on seventeenth-century thought and how at certain critical points it diverges from that thought. [Whitehead, Process and Reality]

This Tuesday, we deliberate on how Whitehead is positioned vis-à-vis other philosophers such as Plato, Descartes, Locke, Hume, Kant and Newton. We read Chapter 6: Whitehead and Other Philosophers


Date: 29 November 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2.30 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

Monday, November 21, 2011

Reading Group: 22 November 2011

What is Perception?

Whitehead says: Perception in its primary form is consciousness of the causal efficacy of the external world by reason of which the percipient is a concrescence from a definitely constituted datum. Perception, in this primary sense, is perception of the settled world in the past as constituted by its feeling-tones, and as efficacious by reason of those feeling-tones. Perception, in this sense of the term, will be called 'perception in the mode of causal efficacy'.

Tomorrow we read Chapter 5: Perception from A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality.

Date: 22 November 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2.30 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

Monday, November 14, 2011

Reading Group: 15 November 2011


So far we were engaged in understanding the nature of actual entities that are conceived by Whitehead as the building blocks of the universe. Now we make the transition from a microcosmic analysis to the macrocosmic picture.

Tomorrow we read Chapter 4: Nexus and the Macrocosmic. The project of this chapter is to understand aggregates of actual entities — nexus and societies, types and levels of social organization.

Date: 15 November 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2:30 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi



And if you think of Brick, for instance.
And you say to Brick: What do you want Brick?
And Brick says to you: I like an Arch.
And if you say to Brick: Look, arches are expensive and I can use a concrete lentil over you. What do you think of that? Brick?
Brick says: …I like an Arch.

[Louis Isadore Kahn]

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Reading Group: 01 November 2011


Next Tuesday we continue with the second half of Chapter 3: The Phases of Concrescence, pages 54 to 70.

Last time, we discussed the first two phases, namely (a) conformal feelings and (b) conceptual feelings. The constitution of an actual entity is a product, both of other actual entities that form its environment (physical feelings) and the potentiality embodied by eternal objects (conceptual feelings). The former gives the object an element of contingency, while the latter crafts the necessity of its being.

Now we move to the third phase, i.e., (c) comparative feelings, which may be either simple or complex.

Date: 01 November 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2:30 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Reading Group: 18 October 2011


After the riveting debate over the meaning of 'potentiality' last week, we now move to Chapter 3: The Phases of Concrescence. Since it is a lengthy chapter, we will be breaking it into two sessions. For next Tuesday we read pages 36 to 54. 

Date: 18 October 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2:00 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

What is concrescence?
[It] is the name given to the process that is any given actual entity; it is the 'real internal constitution of a particular existent'. Concrescence is the growing together of a many into the unity of one. 


Ek Chidiya, Anek Chidiya
Films Division, Doordarshan

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Reading Group: 11 October 2011

Whitehead conceives of three formative elements:
1. Eternal object is always a potentiality for actual entities; but in itself, as conceptually felt, it is neutral as to the fact of its physical ingression in any particular actual entity in the temporal world. 
2. God is the organ of novelty, aiming at intensification. He is the lure for feeling, the eternal urge of desire. The primary element in the 'lure for feeling' is the subject's prehension of the primordial nature of God. 
3. Creativity is the principle of novelty. An actual occasion is a novel entity diverse from any entity in the 'many' which it unifies. Thus 'creativity' introduces novelty into the content of the many, which are the universe disjunctively. 
Next week, we read Chapter 2: The Formative Elements (pp. 20-35) from A Key to Process and Reality.

Date: 11 October 2011 (Tuesday)

Time: 2.30 pm

Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Neutrino and Whitehead

Last Tuesday, doing philosophy over rounds of tea and cookies, we considered K's suggestion that Whitehead's elaboration of the nature of an actual entity may primarily be a theory of causation, albeit not in the standard vocabulary of cause and effect. There was however a general discomfort over the use of anthropomorphic language such as 'feeling' to explain an ontology (of things, not all of which are human). I think Whitehead makes it sufficiently clear what he means by 'feeling', and the definition is by no means merely psychological (i.e., restricted to human psychology) even if it seems to carry that baggage. Feeling is the term used for the basic generic operation of passing from the objectivity of the data to the subjectivity of the actual entity in question (PR 83, 65). Whitehead may be a vitalist, but he is also a realist, celebrating the dynamic character of a plurality of things: apples, cinema, genomes, gnomes! For him, therefore, vitalism is not restricted to human beings or even living organisms; everything in the universe is living. Perhaps this is what Thales meant when/if he said 'all things are full of gods' and thought that magnets have soul. Even the seemingly static and lifeless have a life of their own, and are affected by their own histories, their environment and the inherent potentiality to become.

It remains to be seen how this position holds through subsequent readings.


However, to go back to the question of causeeffect, the hypothesis of the faster-than-light flight of Neutrino (ghostly subatomic particles) is both destabilizing and thrilling because: particles that move faster than light are essentially moving backwards in time, which could make the phrase cause and effect obsolete. How will actual entities moving faster than the speed of light affect other actual entities, their slower comrades?




The Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali, 1931, Oil on canvas, 24 × 33 cm


Thursday, September 22, 2011

An Overview: The Actual Entity, Chapter One

Text: Whitehead, Alfred North and Donald W. Sherburne. 1981. A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Process and Reality is Whitehead’s attempt at describing reality and this description contains ‘the becoming, the being and the relatedness of actual entities’ (p. 7), i.e. what a caterpillar is (being), what a caterpillar can be (becoming), and how a caterpillar can affect a white mulberry leaf (relation).

Immediately, one is curious as to what ‘actual entities’ are. Actual entities (where actual is used in the sense of ‘existent’) are the generically uniform, but specifically different, vital microcosmic units that compose reality — the building blocks (if blocks sounds too blocky to be palatable to Whitehead, let’s say processes) of Whitehead’s ontology. 

Given that actual entities are dynamic rather than static, what gives unity to each of them is called ‘concrescence’, the internal constitution of actual entities. What Whitehead calls the diversity of the many, must therefore be temporally diverse and yet successive. Concrescence is then nothing but the process that is to be understood as a unit of reality, a process that is striving towards ‘satisfaction’.

Whitehead’s actual entities seem like Leibniz’s monads, but they differ from them in so far as they are constantly in the process of becoming. Also, they are not windowless as in the case of Leibniz; in fact they are all windows, and in that sense every actual entity is a ‘mode of the process of feeling the world’ (p. 8).

Experience of the world from the available data (derived from the objectification of other actual occasion), then constitutes every actual entity. The transition of the objective data into subjectivity is termed as ‘feeling’. Feeling is the process of the absorption of the so-called ‘others’ of the universe, of transforming the external into a form of internality. 

An actual entity is a product of its interaction with various elements of the universe. Its being is constituted by what the universe is for it. It appropriates some of these elements, and excludes others. Whitehead’s cosmology is then absolutely relational, and the concrete and definite bonds of relatedness are called prehensions. A subject prehends a data by giving it a subjective form (subject, data and the subjective form then being three factors of prehension). Prehensions may be positive or negative, depending on whether the subject excludes or includes the datum. The case of inclusion is called feeling. An actual entity is the subject of feelings.

The initial datum, which we have been discussing, is nothing but another actual entity and the moment of its objectification occurs when it becomes a feeling for the subject. The feeling is constituted of five factors (p.12): (a) the subject which feels (b) the initial data which are to be felt (c) the elimination in virtue of negative prehensions (d) the objective datum which is felt (e) the subjective form, which is how that subject feels the objective datum.

The politics of actual entities governs how one entity will be objectified for the other, i.e. how much power it holds over the other. Feelings are the manner in which elements of nature immortalize themselves.

Every actual entity has a point of termination which is concomitant with the attainment of what Whitehead calls satisfaction. When an actual entity has successfully established a concrete relationship with every other entity in the universe, either positively or negatively, it is satisfied and complete. This completing is also a termination of the process. In every phase of the process of concrescence, something new is added to the process until it is completely satisfied. This integration is essential to the character of actual entities, and there is a telos towards which they move — the final cause being a complete determination, a definiteness. To attain this definiteness, completeness and satisfaction is to become objectively immortal. Now, even though its own existence has evaporated, the actual entity can still affect other entities, and showcase its power.

What is central to the system of Whitehead, is the relatedness of actualities. Things that have seemingly perished, are absorbed into the living and that is how reality continues to become. Mr Caterpillar is immortalized in becoming a butterfly. Each actual entity has a potentiality for process and must perfect itself. Once perfect, and satisfied, the entity seems to close-up. And yet, in spite of the dead, there is no real death for the satisfied entity is objectively immortal — a being beyond itself, for the future, potentiality. 

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Reading Group: 20 September 2011

Next week we read Chapter 1: The Actual Entity from A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality.
Date: 20 September, 2011 (Tuesday) 
Time: 2.00 pm 
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi


'Actual entities', also termed 'actual occasions', are the final real things of which the world is made up. There is no going behind actual entities to find anything more real. (A. N. Whitehead. 1978. Process and Reality. New York: Free Press. p. 18)



I showed my masterpiece to the grown-ups, and asked them whether the drawing frightened them. But they answered: Frighten? Why should any one be frightened by a hat? My drawing was not a picture of a hat. It was a picture of a boa constrictor digesting an elephant. But since the grown-ups were not able to understand it, I made another drawing: I drew the inside of a boa constrictor, so that the grown-ups could see it clearly. They always need to have things explained. My drawing number two looked like this.



[Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince]




Monday, September 12, 2011

Process and Reality: Course


Primary Text: Whitehead, Alfred North and Donald W. Sherburne. 1981. A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schedule (tentative): September to November

Chapter 1: The Actual Entity - 20.09.2011                       
Chapter 2: The Formative Elements - 27.09.2011                       
Chapter 3: The Phases of Concrescence - 11.10.2011; 18.10.2011                                           
Chapter 4: Nexus and the Macrocosmic - 25.10.2011                       
Chapter 5: Perception - 01.11.2011                       
Chapter 6: Whitehead and Other Philosophers - 08.11.2011; 15.11.2011                      
Chapter 7: God and the World - 22.11.2011                       
Chapter 8: In Defense of Speculative Philosophy - 29.11.2011




Thursday, September 8, 2011

Reading Group: 13 September 2011

The proposed reading for next week's discussion is Chapter 13: Requisites for Social Change (pp. 192-208) from A. N. Whitehead's Science and the Modern World.

Date: 13 September, 2011 (Tuesday) 
Time: 2.30 pm 
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi




2001: A Space Odyssey and Samsung-Apple patent war!
What seems like a technological fiction at one moment in history, transforms into the actual, concrete and ‘real’ in no time. Now we talk of space elevators and Domino's Pizza on moon.

Monday, September 5, 2011

Reading Group: 6 September 2011

This is to unveil the Philosophy Reading Group, New Delhi. This week we discuss Chapter 7: Relativity (pp. 115-130) from A. N. Whitehead's Science and the Modern World.

Date: 6 September, 2011 (Tuesday)
Time: 2.00 pm
Venue: Library, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi

All are invited.







The rabbit, at rest. Or is it?